Extrasolar planets peculiar
2 comments
Friends, As far as I know SWEEPS-10 and his brethren 1-16 with magnitudes between ~ 20 and ~ 25 have not yet passed the candidates confirmed exoplanets. Only SWEEPS 4:11 were confirmed and officially recognized as such. The difficulty in confirming these candidates from a 7-day survey done by Hubble Space Telescope (HST) is related to their magnitudes. It is difficult to make reliable and spectra conveniently analyze the data of radial velocity induced by the mass of a planet. No doubt that every new discovery lies on the ground all the knowledge they had of training and characterization of planetary systems, there is a great diversity of systems and we are still starting the survey was by satellite.
Then checking the claims of artistic recreations, we have: - NASA, ESA, GF Benedict (University of Texas, Austin) - NASA / JPL 's PlanetQuest / Caltech; - NASA, ESA, A. Schaller (for STScI) - ESO / OAMP.
For this, I ask: is there a lack of scientific rigor in this case? Maybe. But seeing that the article appears on Space.com and taking into consideration the claims above, it seems to me that if they "facilitate" this situation, we can also help ...!
You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> aerospatiale toulouse <b> aerospatiale toulouse <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> < del datetime = ""> <em> <i> <Q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Latest Comments Congratulations on Spitzer Spitzer Telescope finds small exoplanet, which should be a ball of fire! Congratulations on New Spitzer Telescope Observations of Comet ISON Telescope Spitzer Telescope Spitzer Congratulations on 14 Brown Dwarfs Congratulations Spitzer Telescope Giant Ring on Saturn! Congratulations on Spitzer Telescope Orion Nebula by the Hubble Spitzer
Categories Select Category 1 Minute of Astronomy (2) 2009 - International Year of Astronomy (35) @ Home (95) Google (33) Disclosure Activities (335) Coimbra (19) Exhibitions (16) Jose Matos (50) Lisbon (64 ) ORION (15) Port (35) Water everywhere (66) Brown Dwarfs (36) Animals in Space (24) Anti-Matter (20) Art (215) Music (96) Scientific articles (51) Astrobiology (551 ) Carlos Oliveira (37) Contact ETs (74) Detect aerospatiale toulouse ETs (65) Documentaries (17) Panspermia (65) Zita Martins (3) Fermi Paradox (51) Astrophotography (886) APOD (564) Miguel Claro (100) timelapse ( 56) Rocket Science (1154) Astronauts (88) News in Orbit (48) Collision (5) ISS (291) Humor (32) Releases (317) NASA (264) Space Plan (83) Satellites (71) Shuttles (163 ) Atlantis aerospatiale toulouse (55) Discovery (36) Endeavour (36) Amateur Astronomy (125) Alberto Fernando (24) John Gregory (14) PRO-AM (24) Astropolítica (399) Brazil aerospatiale toulouse (28) China (59) USA (5) Europe in Space (49) India (9) Iran (10) Japan (23) Portugal (124) Russia (42) astroPT (246) Carl Sagan (107) Cosmos (9) Carlos Oliveira (116) Cartoons aerospatiale toulouse (135) Ceres ( 14) Important Science (236) Quotes (158) Communications (33) International Conference (57) Cosmology (489) Einstein ring (6) & nb
2 comments
Friends, As far as I know SWEEPS-10 and his brethren 1-16 with magnitudes between ~ 20 and ~ 25 have not yet passed the candidates confirmed exoplanets. Only SWEEPS 4:11 were confirmed and officially recognized as such. The difficulty in confirming these candidates from a 7-day survey done by Hubble Space Telescope (HST) is related to their magnitudes. It is difficult to make reliable and spectra conveniently analyze the data of radial velocity induced by the mass of a planet. No doubt that every new discovery lies on the ground all the knowledge they had of training and characterization of planetary systems, there is a great diversity of systems and we are still starting the survey was by satellite.
Then checking the claims of artistic recreations, we have: - NASA, ESA, GF Benedict (University of Texas, Austin) - NASA / JPL 's PlanetQuest / Caltech; - NASA, ESA, A. Schaller (for STScI) - ESO / OAMP.
For this, I ask: is there a lack of scientific rigor in this case? Maybe. But seeing that the article appears on Space.com and taking into consideration the claims above, it seems to me that if they "facilitate" this situation, we can also help ...!
You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> aerospatiale toulouse <b> aerospatiale toulouse <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> < del datetime = ""> <em> <i> <Q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Latest Comments Congratulations on Spitzer Spitzer Telescope finds small exoplanet, which should be a ball of fire! Congratulations on New Spitzer Telescope Observations of Comet ISON Telescope Spitzer Telescope Spitzer Congratulations on 14 Brown Dwarfs Congratulations Spitzer Telescope Giant Ring on Saturn! Congratulations on Spitzer Telescope Orion Nebula by the Hubble Spitzer
Categories Select Category 1 Minute of Astronomy (2) 2009 - International Year of Astronomy (35) @ Home (95) Google (33) Disclosure Activities (335) Coimbra (19) Exhibitions (16) Jose Matos (50) Lisbon (64 ) ORION (15) Port (35) Water everywhere (66) Brown Dwarfs (36) Animals in Space (24) Anti-Matter (20) Art (215) Music (96) Scientific articles (51) Astrobiology (551 ) Carlos Oliveira (37) Contact ETs (74) Detect aerospatiale toulouse ETs (65) Documentaries (17) Panspermia (65) Zita Martins (3) Fermi Paradox (51) Astrophotography (886) APOD (564) Miguel Claro (100) timelapse ( 56) Rocket Science (1154) Astronauts (88) News in Orbit (48) Collision (5) ISS (291) Humor (32) Releases (317) NASA (264) Space Plan (83) Satellites (71) Shuttles (163 ) Atlantis aerospatiale toulouse (55) Discovery (36) Endeavour (36) Amateur Astronomy (125) Alberto Fernando (24) John Gregory (14) PRO-AM (24) Astropolítica (399) Brazil aerospatiale toulouse (28) China (59) USA (5) Europe in Space (49) India (9) Iran (10) Japan (23) Portugal (124) Russia (42) astroPT (246) Carl Sagan (107) Cosmos (9) Carlos Oliveira (116) Cartoons aerospatiale toulouse (135) Ceres ( 14) Important Science (236) Quotes (158) Communications (33) International Conference (57) Cosmology (489) Einstein ring (6) & nb
No comments:
Post a Comment