Six years after the adoption of the REACH Regulation, which aims to protect European citizens and t

Regional actions (15/183) Air City (22/183) Power (183/183) Asbestos paris air show 2011 (12/183) Bio-accumulation in the flora and fauna (15/183) Bisphenol A (36/183) Noise ( 50/183) European Framework (36/183) Cancer (55/183) federal Skills (17/183) Regional Skills (16/183) Hazardous Waste (10/183) Children (37/183) Epidemiology (13/183) Risk assessment (16/183) differentiated Management (10/183) GSM (26/183) Ecological Inequalities (12/183) Gardening (10/183) Cardiovascular Diseases (10/183) Nanotechnology (34/183) paris air show 2011 GMO (36 / 183) Electromagnetic waves (68/183) fine particles (28/183) endocrine disruptor paris air show 2011 (57/183) Pesticides (148/183) Air pollution (24/183) Domestic Pollution (14/183) paris air show 2011 Caution (27 / 183) Prevention (17/183) Chemicals (22/183) Global Warming (16/183) REACH (13/183) hormonal system (13/183) paris air show 2011 Transportation (12/183) Road Transport (22/183) Bike (10/183)
Six years after the adoption of the REACH Regulation, which aims to protect European citizens and the environment from exposure to hazardous chemicals, the European Environmental Bureau / (EEB) and ClientEarth today published a damning report the role that the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has played in the implementation of the regulation. The chemical industry has largely failed to provide data necessary for the proper functioning of the Regulation and ECHA has not only allowed these practices without challenging, but also used its resources to keep the public in ignorance of these facts.
The audit [1] carried out by the two associations between late 2011 and mid-March 2012 found fundamental flaws in the vast majority paris air show 2011 of substances paris air show 2011 registered under the Regulation. Co-author of the report, explains Christian Schaible: "REACH is based on two key legal principles:" no data, no market "and" one substance, one registration ". However, our study showed that they are regularly ignored when the registration of substances. "
Records of very poor quality, including paris air show 2011 irrelevant information or empty fields and are absolutely not comply with REACH requirements were accepted by ECHA. It not only validated the files, but it also subsequently failed to use its powers to require registrants complete information.
ECHA has already recognized that many substances paris air show 2011 have been wrongly recorded as intermediate products in the industry, in order to avoid disclosure. But the survey shows that the industry as a whole, failed to return all available test data on their substances, paris air show 2011 as required by REACH. And ECHA's too little to limit these practices and complacent during compliance audits. In addition, ECHA spends too little time on the job substitution and elimination of hazardous chemicals, substances which European paris air show 2011 citizens are exposed every day. Even more alarming: 28 of 40 SVHC analyzed, identified by ChemSec in the INS list (! For Substitute It Now), present problems paris air show 2011 of classification and labeling [2], which compromises the ability for users understand the health and environmental risks of chemicals to which they are exposed. In addition, it is common that different companies do not classify in the same way the same substance, which is obviously not desirable [3]!
The report finds that the Agency is padlocked by a culture of secrecy - under pressure from the chemical industry, which uses the "commercial confidentiality" as an excuse paris air show 2011 to avoid disclosing important information [4]. The report finds that ECHA has not only failed in its mission of proactive dissemination of information but, more fundamentally, it retains the information it is nevertheless responsible for communicating to ensure public safety and protection environment [5]. This is particularly paris air show 2011 challenging in an agency that the European Court of Auditors identified last week as having a number of "weaknesses" paris air show 2011 in relation to conflicts of interest ...
[1] This audit covered the issues of classification, the safe exposure limits and occupational exposure limits derived input from safe use, disruption of the endocrine system and the quality